Quote
Tony Leggett
You can upgrade to a drm-free track for a small fee.
Shouldn't realnetworks be providing DRM-free tracks to former customers?
If they had used their dominant market position in one area to gain a dominant market position in another area while actively erecting barriers to entry for potential competition, yes.
Although not all of the tracks Apple sold were made available for the DRM-free upgrade. Still, that's beside the point.
While it's perfectly legal to have a dominating position over a given market segment, it is not legal to use that position to force out competition in another segment. Apple was the indisputable leader in the portable music player market and parlayed that into their leadership of the digital music sales market. That by itself may have gathered regulatory scrutiny but probably could have survived without issue but when they actively took steps to prevent RealNetworks from selling music to iPod owners, they crossed a line.
Sure, Apple started selling DRM-free tracks later on but that didn't change the fact that they had already crushed the competition by tying the iPod and iTunes together and taking steps to lock out competitors. I haven't looked into the arguments in this case, but I'm sure RealNetworks wants money since that's really all they can hope for given the lack of time travel technology.