MacOS X a dog or just in need of a good bitch slap?
Dr Phred
(Moderator)
– December 10, 2007 10:05AM
Can't keep a good topic down....
-Swine Flu free since...cough, cough...
bahamut
– October 15, 2010 03:49AM
It's obvious. They're going to launch OS 10.7. No question about it. If'in they have any brains it'll be exactly what we were talking about … with a revamped iTunes at the core of the update. Tread carefully Steve Jobs, you have to distinguish iTunes for Mac from iTunes from Windows without queering the latter. I think that the iPad interface for iTunes, flawed though it is, probably has some clues.
Lion's important though. Better figure out what to drop it for. You could also make Lioness, but then what do you call 10.9? Cub? Methinks that the Mac OS morphs into the iOS at 11.30 …
Steve's all about the legacy now. Much as he'd like to run Apple another 20, he's not a well man. Unless he thinks he'll die if he leaves (well, could be, plenty of people are like that, drop dead the next day after they retire sitting on their porch), he probably has an exit strategy within the decade.
I'd say it consists of this…
Work on Mac OS and converge it with iOS … I think the appropriate launch is with touchscreen Macs. Steve has to rethink the interface to eliminate the mouse.
POTENTIALLY, a mouseless Macbook Air running iOS could be the start. Having used that bluetooth keyboard that JW has mentioned on my iPad, I can see it. The elements are all definitely there plus there's a bit of weirdness that suggests things that haven't been thought out all the way (as in ready for expansion).
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/15/2010 03:55AM by bahamut.
Tony Leggett
(Moderator)
– October 15, 2010 05:36PM
Quote
Steve has to rethink the interface to eliminate the mouse.
This worries me. A lot of the multi-touch stuff requires two or more fingers simultaneously - things I can't do.
bahamut
– October 15, 2010 06:00PM
Aie… Well there's the new order for you. Nobody said it'd be pretty.
El Jeffe
– October 15, 2010 06:05PM
What a journey.
There is no excuse for not having AS AN OPTION, at least partial or not total voice command and control in a modern OS dagnabbit!
bahamut
– October 15, 2010 06:09PM
Voiceover my friend!
El Jeffe
– October 16, 2010 02:22AM
What a journey.
Is it that good? Not much fanfare for it.
johnny k
– October 16, 2010 08:36AM
Quote
bahamut
Work on Mac OS and converge it with iOS … I think the appropriate launch is with touchscreen Macs. Steve has to rethink the interface to eliminate the mouse.
POTENTIALLY, a mouseless Macbook Air running iOS could be the start. Having used that bluetooth keyboard that JW has mentioned on my iPad, I can see it. The elements are all definitely there plus there's a bit of weirdness that suggests things that haven't been thought out all the way (as in ready for expansion).
Not saying you're dead on, but this rings true, particularly the first bit. We've been seeing hints here and there, but without a revamped UI there's no way touch comes to Macs. Such a UI will have to be 90% iOS. iOS Pro might have windows, or panes. The operation modes are so different that running legacy apps would require the OS X environment to take over the screen.
Tony Leggett
(Moderator)
– October 16, 2010 02:26PM
Do we really need another round of legacy apps?
johnny k
– October 16, 2010 05:45PM
Do we really need another legacy OS hanging on too long?
Don't worry, Jobs will just kill old apps dead after 2 years. FULL TRANSITION TO ARM
John Willoughby
– October 16, 2010 06:49PM
Homo Sapiens Sedentarius
I'm not seeing the full Photoshop for ARM any time soon.
El Jeffe
– October 17, 2010 02:51AM
What a journey.
Software as a Service.
porruka
(Admin)
– October 17, 2010 01:26PM
Since I tossed out the nugget that started this one, let me say this: while I don't believe the new Air will be A4 (that really was just a discussion point), I do believe that the next hardware transition is not only on the planning table, it has real potential to be "silent". In the iDevices, Apple has slowly been recapturing its hardware ownership. A(Nd as I'm writing this, my opinion is shifting slightly, but I'll just slide into the new thought) There might not be a formal transition any time soon for the "Pro" line, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the consumer line do some dancing. Still "silent", though, through translation and emulation. Devs still compile to the Intel target, what's running it underneath becomes a black box, much like the original Macintosh idea and much closer to what the iOS is doing right now.
John Willoughby
– October 17, 2010 05:20PM
Homo Sapiens Sedentarius
Can you stretch the hypervisor concept to include a sophisticated UI that can run multiple OS's in multiple windows; a dozen virtual machines running simultaneously?
One UI to bring them all,
One UI to bind them,
One UI to rule them all,
And to Apple bind them.
bahamut
– October 17, 2010 06:29PM
Oh wasn't that what I said about OS X? Red Box, Yellow Box, cocoa, carbon?
John Willoughby
– October 17, 2010 07:27PM
Homo Sapiens Sedentarius
Yes, except a hypervisor is deeper down; all OS's run on top of it. So iOS is a peer of OS X is a peer of Windows, etc.
Dr Phred
(Moderator)
– October 18, 2010 08:16AM
-Swine Flu free since...cough, cough...
One problem of that is performance. Hard to program to the metal when you don't know what the metal will be.
Also I use the mac's ability to run windows all the time. Either via Parallels or booting straight into it for steam games.
porruka
(Admin)
– October 18, 2010 09:13AM
With a real hypervisor, the performance issues that Parallels Desktop and VMWare Fusion face *almost* go away, with a few exceptions (raw device mapping/sharing is still one of them from what I can tell).But, for "most people" the HV layer wouldn't be very heavyweight.
And don't forget, there were "morphing" chipsets in the works before, and still will be. Chipset independence that doesn't go true lowest common denominator is something that could be very powerful for a broad range of devices. Look at how the company is putting heavy emphasis on software layers that abstract the hardware. Bare metal programming is not required for very many applications (far fewer than it's actually used for) and Apple knows that.
Roger
– October 20, 2010 08:59AM
First reactions to "Lion" during the "Back to the Mac" event announcement? The attempt to propagate iOS interface elements back into a desktop OS seems, at first blush, like a complete disaster. This looks like yet another round of the kind of Steve's weird UI blundering that began with the first previews of Aqua (with later dev/user pushback likely forcing backpedalling later). Obviously it's early days to conclude this for sure, but this Mac-as-iPad thing looks like a potential UI nightmare in the offing.
Roger
– October 20, 2010 09:05AM
"Launchpad"? WTF. They should just call it the fucking Windows Start menu.