<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Click Click Click</title>
        <description>[quote=his tongue went click click click as his head hit the basket after the guillotine's blade had sliced it cleanly. for a few seconds his eyes blinked and a reddening of the cheeks was noted by the attending physician. the crowd howled in glee... 

oh, i'm sorry, wrong topic. click click click is for camera/photo/digital photo discussions which seem to have a place in our hearts.][/quote]

Originally started by Baha at the old site, I thought it was time we brought it to the new boards</description>
        <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,1726#msg-1726</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:49:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.16</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42323#msg-42323</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42323#msg-42323</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ roger that. I'll expand my search.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:51:26 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42318#msg-42318</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42318#msg-42318</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Opinions? Yeah, I've got opinions. Note that I've had two glasses of wine and I'm a Canon guy so take what I say here shortly with a grain of salt. <br />
<br />
DSLR bodies with built in focusing motors are stupid, worthless and poorly thought out. Seriously. Putting a one-size-fits-all motor in a body was the gaffe that cost Nikon the market leader position and let Canon take over. When autofocus was first being popularized, Canon went with the motor in the lens under the theory that some lenses were big and needed big motors whereas some lenses were small and, wait for it, needed small motors. Some lenses, like telephotos needed a huge focusing range while wide angles needed a much shorter range. By building the motor into the lens, Canon let the lens decide the necessary characteristics of the motor. At the time the market was about Nikon:Canon 80:20%. Over the ensuing years, that mistake shifted the market to about 80% Canon. Mostly because of the superior lenses that were mostly superior because of their focusing ability -- which was a direct function of the in lens motor. <br />
<br />
I recall being astounded that the same Nikon body motor was driving the focus (and badly driving the focus as I recall) in both wide angles and 300mm/2.8 telephotos which are entirely different beasts. The motor was poorly suited to both tasks then and still is now. Oh sure, Nikon made the switch to in lens motors some time later but it was too little too late.<br />
<br />
You may have a stash of lenses that rely on a body focusing motor. They may produce brilliant images. It may not be cost effective to replace them. But those lenses _are_ the poorly thought out past. Your call.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Alan Lehman</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:57:12 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42310#msg-42310</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42310#msg-42310</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Ok. Priced my used (but pristine) 85/1.8 (NON D) on eBay. Looks like about $350. So, to REPLACE that good of a lens with a newer one that would even work with the entry-level Nikon DSLRs would be pretty pricey.<br />
My reviewing of this spreadsheet I borrowed/cobbled together says the D7000 might be my best option. It DOES have internal focus motor, so I would not have to replace any of my old glass. Any opinions?<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/3110/screenshot20130519at853.png" class="bbcode" border="0" />]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:55:04 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42309#msg-42309</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42309#msg-42309</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ bitten by the DSLR upgrade bug bad. I WILL pull the trigger. <br />
Took my 'kit' to Roberts Camera. NONE Of my lenses will work with today's current generation of Nikon entry-level DSLRs. :(<br />
So, sell all my lenses including my coveted 85mm/1.8 that took the below photos yesterday? AND... AND buy new lenses (new means new, used, refurb...et al)?????<br />
<br />
Or step up to an non-entry level (Mid or pro), OLDER, USED/Refurb DSLR that still has the lens focus motor built-in? And AND keep my lenses.<br />
<br />
I will be "Running the numbers" so to speak to see what makes the most sense. <br />
<br />
Stepping up might mean older non-movie DSLRs. Not a biggie. <br />
<br />
Or, get the 24MP D3200 with lens kit and start my new lens collection anew.... choices.....<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/5725/screenshot20130519at112.png" class="bbcode" border="0" /><br />
<img src="http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/5725/screenshot20130519at112.png" class="bbcode" border="0" /><br />
<img src="http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/5725/screenshot20130519at112.png" class="bbcode" border="0" />]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:29:51 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42188#msg-42188</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42188#msg-42188</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ thanks.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 21:04:33 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42185#msg-42185</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42185#msg-42185</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ If that's the price range you're looking at, I will put my broken record on the turntable: Click on that B&amp;H banner up there and get an NEX-F3. <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/859418-REG/Sony_NEX_F3K_B_Alpha_NEX_F3K_Digital_Camera.html"  rel="nofollow">http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/859418-REG/Sony_NEX_F3K_B_Alpha_NEX_F3K_Digital_Camera.html</a><br />
<br />
Snapsort won't help you there since it's comparing cameras from different categories, and it's wrong about some things (like image stabilization).]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:52:30 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42171#msg-42171</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42171#msg-42171</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Unless someone really likes the Nikon J stuff, let me know.<br />
But using the Canon SX30 IS last night - the thing drives me nuts. Luckily I took 4 cameras. <br />
Trusty Nikon D50 with 85/1.8 always comes to deliver!<br />
<br />
So, what about these two choices? Any better than Canon SX30 IS performance-wise? (time from button press to one or more photos!!!!)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Sony-Cyber-Shot-DSC-HX300"  rel="nofollow">http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Sony-Cyber-Shot-DSC-HX300</a><br />
<br />
FIFTY TIMES (50X) zoom ! wow!<br />
<br />
Or, do I just need to shell out the bucks for a step up from my Nikon D50, get rid of my ORIGINAL AFs (35-70/70-210) that they put out?  I have no clue what best deals are out there for Canon / Nikon DSLRs and glass.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 08:24:29 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42026#msg-42026</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42026#msg-42026</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Well there's the Leica M 240. You could put R telephoto lenses on it.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bahamut</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:23:56 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42008#msg-42008</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42008#msg-42008</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Ooh, thanks, Tom. Exactly what I need. Hackable, even, so I could attach a motion sensor. Guess that would eliminate the Hero3 Silver.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:59:46 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42006#msg-42006</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42006#msg-42006</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Alan Lehman</strong><br/>
I'm giddy with excitement. My most recent impulse buy is a used Canon 1d mk iv. It arrives Thursday. I've lusted after one of these since 'round about the time of the mk ii. And at 10fps, I'll likely put &gt;1000 new frames on it this weekend at a soccer game.</div></blockquote>
<br />
I'm starting to shop around for a camera to take on my safari in August.  Not sure how much I want to spend, though.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Cloudscout</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:29:49 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42005#msg-42005</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42005#msg-42005</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Yes, johnnyk, one minute is the longest interval natively. There is this: <a href="http://cam-do.com/GoProTimeController.html"  rel="nofollow">http://cam-do.com/GoProTimeController.html</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>tomierna</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:49:02 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42000#msg-42000</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,42000#msg-42000</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I'm giddy with excitement. My most recent impulse buy is a used Canon 1d mk iv. It arrives Thursday. I've lusted after one of these since 'round about the time of the mk ii. And at 10fps, I'll likely put &gt;1000 new frames on it this weekend at a soccer game.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Alan Lehman</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:30:51 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41995#msg-41995</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41995#msg-41995</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I have a 3. Have not used it much, but it seems fine.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bahamut</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:22:31 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41992#msg-41992</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41992#msg-41992</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Is it true that 1 minute is the longest interval? Once an hour would be fine for me, if it lets me go a week without swapping batteries.<br />
Now that I'm reading more, I'm worried about the firmware issues in the Hero3. the 2 would be fine.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:59:47 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41986#msg-41986</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41986#msg-41986</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Yes, I've used GoPros 2 and 3 (black) for outdoor time lapse.<br />
<br />
Your biggest problem will be getting power into the thing, and keeping it watertight.<br />
<br />
The waterproof housing doesn't allow for external power, and the battery life won't let you do a really long timelapse.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>tomierna</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:05:50 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41938#msg-41938</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41938#msg-41938</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Anyone use a GoPro, especially for outdoor time-lapse?  Was thinking of getting an older model and this deal for the latest one came up today: <a href="http://slickdeals.net/f/5981774-GoPro-HERO3-Silver-Edition-1080P-Camera-233-Free-Shipping?sdxt0=engadget&amp;sdxt1=2013-04-22&amp;sdxt2=5"  rel="nofollow">http://slickdeals.net/f/5981774-GoPro-HERO3-Silver-Edition-1080P-Camera-233-Free-Shipping?sdxt0=engadget&amp;sdxt1=2013-04-22&amp;sdxt2=5</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:03:26 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41053#msg-41053</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41053#msg-41053</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Can't say enough nice things about my NEX-5. The range of lenses are steadily growing. I got a Sony credit card at the same time, and now I think I have enough points to redeem for a macro lens. The current model is 2 generations beyond mine. Touchscreen (which normally I'd consider a negative on cameras, but the NEX has very few hardware controls), WiFi (another thing I love love love - I have an eyeFi card). But if you're looking at a traditional DSLR form factor, it's quite a bit different.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:37:01 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41051#msg-41051</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41051#msg-41051</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I'll let others chime in with specific camera, but I like playing with this site...<br />
<br />
<a href="http://snapsort.com"  rel="nofollow">http://snapsort.com</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 02:22:20 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41050#msg-41050</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,41050#msg-41050</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ With the running costs of my Minolta X700 becoming unreasonable, I'm in the market for a new camera (timeframe of six months or so). I'm obviously not tied to any particular system, and I was wondering if anyone has particular reccommendations? I've been doing some research, and the two obvious candidates are the Canon Rebel T<i>x</i>i series (for values of x in the region of 3 and 4), and the equivalent Nikon cameras (the 5000 series, I believe). I know that there are other players too, but I'm not so familiar with Pentax, Olympus, Sony etc. - do those systems have 'room to grow?' I want the "starter kit" to come in at less than $1k, and closer to $500 would be preferable. However, I wouldn't want to spend $500 this year, and decide next year that I should have bought the $900 one, IYSWIM.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>YDD</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 23:00:47 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,39099#msg-39099</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,39099#msg-39099</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I've always had the dream that someone could do high def scanning of my old 8mm films and color correct (et al) them one frame at a time and properly put back into a 'movie'.<br />
Up for the challenge? (LOL)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 07:02:17 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,39091#msg-39091</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,39091#msg-39091</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The Pacific Image PrimeFilm 1800AFL.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Cloudscout</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:53:27 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,39087#msg-39087</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,39087#msg-39087</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ what model did you get?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Mokers</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:21:22 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,39078#msg-39078</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,39078#msg-39078</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I picked up a used slide/negative scanner on eBay that arrived today.  It's only 1800dpi but it has an auto-feeder that lets you scan uncut rolls of film/slides.<br />
<br />
This has the added benefit of allowing you to scan old filmstrips.<br />
<br />
It's a little tricky, though.  Filmstrips didn't use the same frame size as 35mm still-cameras.  Two frames of a filmstrip fit within one frame of a normal 35mm camera.  There are two ways to overcome this, I can manually crop each frame as I scan but that means I would have to sit in front of the computer for a very long time.  Instead, I'm letting it scan pairs of frames so I can let it run as a continuous batch job and I'll go in later and split the pairs into separate frames.<br />
<br />
The next task will be importing the audio and then pairing it with the still frames in a video.  I wonder if I could do a filmstrip projector-style transition effect...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Cloudscout</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:07:48 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38400#msg-38400</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38400#msg-38400</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Pogue makes a faux-pas here:<br />
<br />
"(As on any camera, that aperture shrinks as you zoom in. When you’re fully zoomed on this camera, you’re down to f/4.9. That’s still better than the Canon’s fully zoomed aperture — f/5.9.)"<br />
<br />
All of my zoom lenses are 2.8 the entire range.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>tomierna</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 22:45:28 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38399#msg-38399</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38399#msg-38399</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ all you doubters! LOL]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:32:27 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38383#msg-38383</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38383#msg-38383</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Yup, looks like it's the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/28/technology/personaltech/a-pocket-camera-even-pro-photographers-can-love-state-of-the-art.html">Sony RX100</a> all right.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Bruce Robertson</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:54:47 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38130#msg-38130</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38130#msg-38130</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Nikon 18-300 lens<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/chbafdw"  rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/chbafdw</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 05:24:26 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38117#msg-38117</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38117#msg-38117</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I just found borrowlenses.com<br />
Nice.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:23:42 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38082#msg-38082</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38082#msg-38082</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I wouldn't be surprised if he means the Sony. I doubt he means anything Apple.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bahamut</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:39:23 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38070#msg-38070</guid>
            <title>Re: Click Click Click</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1726,38070#msg-38070</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ That miniturization is cool! Check trailers for the next Sim City game... though we'll probably all be sick of it by then.<br />
<br />
I was vastly amused by this iSupr8 app and used it to make a music video: <a href="http://www.twoangstroms.com/2012/06/09/what-i-did-last-weekend-music-video-edition/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.twoangstroms.com/2012/06/09/what-i-did-last-weekend-music-video-edition/</a><br />
<br />
ddt]]></description>
            <dc:creator>ddt</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:02:48 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
