<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
        <description>The topic that just keeps on giving.</description>
        <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,1370#msg-1370</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:17:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.16</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40927#msg-40927</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40927#msg-40927</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ TPBD!<br />
<br />
This is more "loonie software CEOs" than legislators.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/adobe-has-its-head-in-the-clouds-over-pricing-20130215-2ehat.html"  rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/adobe-has-its-head-in-the-clouds-over-pricing-20130215-2ehat.html</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong></strong><br/>The main questions journalists wanted answered were to do with Adobe gouging Australians on price when it comes to selling software such as Photoshop in Australia. As pointed out by many, including tech website Gizmodo, it's actually cheaper to pay for a return airfare ticket to the US and purchase one particular collection of Adobe's software there than it is to buy it here in Australia - and even then you'll end up with $601 worth of savings, points and a holiday!</div></blockquote>
<br />
Frankly, I think the Australian govt should provide further assistance to help these companies price themselves out of the market. Say, a 100% tariff, the proceeds of which are used to subsidise and promote cheaper competitors with international parity pricing policies.<br />
<br />
Or maybe Australia needs to threaten to "do a china" and instruct law enforcement agencies to place a "lower priority" on copyright infringements of know price-gougers.<br />
<br />
That'll never happen of course, there's so many companies on that list that law enforcement authorities wouldn't be policing anyone.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tony Leggett</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:44:27 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40921#msg-40921</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40921#msg-40921</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ DPBD!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong></strong><br/>"He’s the conductor of his own crazy train," one of Smith's fellow legislators told Fox News.</div></blockquote>
<br />
Gold.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tony Leggett</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:38:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40920#msg-40920</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40920#msg-40920</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I can't believe he said that with a straight face...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tony Leggett</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:37:15 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40913#msg-40913</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40913#msg-40913</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/02/georgia-bill-would-ban-photoshopping-legislators-head-on-porn-stars-body/">“No one has a right to make fun of anyone. It’s not a First Amendment right.”</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:20:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40158#msg-40158</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40158#msg-40158</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Not really.  There was no chance it would ever happen.  I would take it less seriously than Republican plans to eliminate the Federal Reserve and return to the gold standard.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>James DeBenedetti</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:50:27 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40155#msg-40155</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40155#msg-40155</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong></strong><br/>House Republicans: Copyright Law Destroys Markets; It's Time For Real Reform</div></blockquote>
<br />
Wow - kudos but we're officially in opposite-world now...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tony Leggett</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 05:33:17 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40152#msg-40152</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40152#msg-40152</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>johnny k</strong><br/>That's too bad - what have Republicans got to lose now? They've proven ineffective at blowing donors' money on campaigns; might as well appeal to the techno-literate/youth vote with something of actual substance.</div></blockquote>
<br />
What they have to lose is the <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/marco-rubio-age-of-the-earth-2016.php">primary</a>.  As the moderates leave, the shrinking remainder of the party will move further rightward, to the point where it's completely irrelevant - like the Republicans are now in California.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>James DeBenedetti</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:50:01 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40150#msg-40150</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40150#msg-40150</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ That's too bad - what have Republicans got to lose now? They've proven ineffective at blowing donors' money on campaigns; might as well appeal to the techno-literate/youth vote with something of actual substance.<br />
<br />
Leahy has been doing this shit for a while, which makes me think he's just an old confused coot. But hey, electronic civil liberties is not a left/right divide, at least not in a world where Obama is on the left. I think it's more of a corporate interests thing. New senators on both sides are less beholden and more principled about this stuff, like Franken and some of the Tea Partiers.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:18:16 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40149#msg-40149</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40149#msg-40149</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>John Willoughby</strong><br/>
<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/16481921080/house-republicans-copyright-law-destroys-markets-its-time-real-reform.shtml">Wow, something good almost came out of the House Republicans.</a></div></blockquote>
<br />
Almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>James DeBenedetti</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:04:36 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40147#msg-40147</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40147#msg-40147</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Is it cynical to think they see Apple as a Democratic-leaning company with of all people Al Gore on their board as partially a drive to unseat Apple? <br />
I dunno.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:32:49 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40146#msg-40146</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40146#msg-40146</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/16481921080/house-republicans-copyright-law-destroys-markets-its-time-real-reform.shtml">Wow, something good almost came out of the House Republicans.</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:41:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40145#msg-40145</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40145#msg-40145</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552687-38/leahy-scuttles-his-warrantless-e-mail-surveillance-bill/">Never mind.</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:58:07 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40144#msg-40144</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40144#msg-40144</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-rewrite-lets-feds-read-your-e-%20mail-without-warrants/">It turns out that that a bill intended to protect Americans' online privacy turned out to be a great place to add amendments stripping them of that privacy.</a><br />
<br />
Feel like the FCC and SEC and 20 other government agencies ought to be able to read your e-mail without notifying you or a judge?  Then this is the bill for you!<br />
<br />
Otherwise, Americans should contact their senators (<a href="http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm"  rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm</a></a>) and tell them that you are opposed to Leahy's amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:27:22 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40001#msg-40001</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,40001#msg-40001</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/conroy-backs-away-from-internet-filter-20121108-290ym.html">Mr Conroy finally tears down his porn-wall...</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tony Leggett</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:51:44 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39667#msg-39667</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39667#msg-39667</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I'm worried that it will get baked into the printers and, in typical DRM overreach, end up strangling a nascent technology.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 01:02:20 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39664#msg-39664</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39664#msg-39664</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ It's not that. It's "If you want to authorize users to print your models, you have to pay us." I doubt it will stand, but if it did, it might encourage non-DRMed models to avoid the patent.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:47:17 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39662#msg-39662</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39662#msg-39662</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Not surprising. People suck.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>El Jeffe</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:58:59 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39659#msg-39659</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39659#msg-39659</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5952780/new-patent-could-saddle-3d-printers-with-drm">"Sorry, you can't 3D print anything that doesn't have our authorization."</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:27:32 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39468#msg-39468</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39468#msg-39468</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Cosine: I'm already gearing my kids towards mid-to-low level universities, unless they want to be doctors or lawyers.  I went to a mid-level college that was trying to become a high-level college by charging Ivy League tuitions.  (Didn't work.)  My degrees have never mattered anywhere that I worked, except as a check-mark on HR's list of requirements.  I could have gotten a better education for a lot less money.  And the whole cycle of easy student loans to higher tuitions to massive debt for graduates needs to stop.  It's hard enough to survive in this economy without a millstone hung around your neck dragging you down.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:29:02 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39467#msg-39467</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39467#msg-39467</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Tangent: I signed up and started three (down to two) Coursera courses, and I find the online education thing facing both scale and form issues. It may just be my learning style, but getting video lectures, written notes, and interaction only via message boards/emails/asynchronous just doesn't cut it for me. Yes, they're trying to leverage meetups so people can form study groups, but that's neither new nor a replacement for at least on person in a live discussion Knowing The Right Shit and taking/responding to questions. I'm not clear how online learning can have any other modality; my best learning happens in questions and tangents that highlight the topic.<br />
<br />
ddt]]></description>
            <dc:creator>ddt</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:48:14 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39466#msg-39466</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39466#msg-39466</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Also read:<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/how-a-rogue-appeals-court-wrecked-the-patent-system/"  rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/how-a-rogue-appeals-court-wrecked-the-patent-system/</a><br />
<br />
Having this discussion about resistance to change in regards to higher education with my wife yesterday (NPR had some piece on online alternatives). There's too much money in the entrenched system. At least with edu, if the timing is right, something revolutionary and not evolutionary will come about, when society is willing to accept alternative forms of employability to diplomas. I expect/hope this by the time I have college-age children. I have a moral problem with paying a lot of money for a marginal increase in educational value, and incurring that debt. Just feeds the system.<br />
<br />
With patents, the system is protected by a misguided, lobbied government, and I don't see a way out until new-generation tech companies (Google and newer) put the same muscle into lobbying that the old guard does. Or, as with Aereo or MP3 players, one industry goes up against another. Economic interest is going to get it done, nothing else.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:32:45 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39465#msg-39465</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,39465#msg-39465</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/09/29/claim.new.media.delivery.channels.should.be.illegal.before.review/">Before you innovate, check with Congress.</a>  They'll make sure that no existing industries might be harmed by your technology.  But don't worry, existing industries have always eagerly welcomed technologies with the potential to disrupt their business models.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 03:38:27 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38762#msg-38762</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38762#msg-38762</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Gotta pay for the extravagance somehow.  McDonalds paid big bucks (major poundage?) for that title.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 01:20:07 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38761#msg-38761</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38761#msg-38761</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Look out, its <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/draconian-wifi-police-stalk-olympic-games-20120803-23jdc.html">the Olympic Wi-Fi police!</a><br />
<br />
Loved the bit about how fish &amp; chip vendors aren't allowed to sell hot chips by themselves as McDonalds is "the official olympic chip vendor"...<br />
<br />
Capitalism gone mad...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tony Leggett</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:28:32 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38534#msg-38534</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38534#msg-38534</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/sex-party-threatens-google-after-ad-spat-20120720-22e11.html">The anti-censorship political party ends up, quite ironically, the only party censored...</a>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tony Leggett</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:43:23 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38244#msg-38244</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38244#msg-38244</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I think that, in Delaware, prostitution is not illegal if the entire transaction takes place in a private domicile.  E.g., escort is called, comes to home, cash exchanges hands within, adult activities ensue, escort departs.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:20:52 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38236#msg-38236</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38236#msg-38236</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ So, the only legal place for hookers in the US is some parts of Nevada?<br />
<br />
Did not know that...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tony Leggett</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:23:37 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38202#msg-38202</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38202#msg-38202</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Heavy-handed attempt at stopping child porn <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/6/18/3093146/backpage-com-prostitution-law-take-down-youtube-twitter-wikipedia">could end up killing the internet.</a><br />
<br />
Why is it so hard for single-issue activists to even consider the ramifications of their demands?  I guess that would be the "single-issue" thing...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:39:35 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38041#msg-38041</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38041#msg-38041</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The governments need taxes to subsidize their postal systems.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>johnny k</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:25:58 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38040#msg-38040</guid>
            <title>Re: Loonie Legislators and that Wacky Webernet Thingo</title>
            <link>http://www.macedition.com/forums/read.php?4,1370,38040#msg-38040</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5916875/europe-wants-to-tax-internet-giants-for-bandwidth-use">Here we go again.</a><br />
<br />
You pay for "unlimited" internet.  FaceBook pays for their internet.  Yet, somehow, more money is owed to telcos because you and FaceBook are using the internet to communicate with each other.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Willoughby</dc:creator>
            <category>Spork Central</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:54:44 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
